To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
I have Triggs, Foltynewicz, Daniel Norris, Andriese & Vizciano. The RP eligibility for Triggs and Andriese gives me the option to start both over Vizciano or start him and one of the 2 in an SP slot. All of these SPs received a Maybe. Is any one’s matchup you’re particularly concerned with that would bet better to lean on the side of caution and sit?
I like Triggs the most there against the Royals and would be most worried about Andriese.
On Friday, you put Finnegan on your “questionable” two-start list. On Saturday, you listed him as “start” for each of his start. Did you change your mind, or does the additive risk make him a worse play with weekly lineups than in a daily league?
You nailed it in the last sentence. I think on a per start basis, I’d most likely run him out there. However, I don’t want to commit for the full week and if the first start against Pittsburgh goes south, which it totally could, that “start” later in the week becomes very questionable.
I know that’s confusing and I wouldn’t argue if you wanted to label both of these Finn starts as “Maybe”, but for now I’m rolling with him on a per-start basis after his impressive command and tweaked mechanics last time out.
Need to pick 2 to start for a deep weekly league. Daniel Norris, Boyd, mike leake, or neris or Benoit. Was leaning neris and norris, but Boyd does have 2 starts. What do you think?
I’d be avoiding Boyd right now. Norris/Neris seems like the right call.
Gsellman @MIA, Lynn @WAS or Walker @SF+@LAD this week, pick one? Leaning towards Gsellman.
I’m with you there! Give me Gsellman.
Verlander against Cleveland
Degrom against Miami
McCullers against Oakland
Paxton against Texas
I can only start 3. Who gets left out?
Am I really saying Paxton?
I’m saying Paxton :(
In a deep league 17 teams, I am finding it very difficult to sit pitchers as the majority of the roster is made up with pitchers of questionable quality, and virtually nothing on waivers.
If I followed all the sit recommendations then I would barely start any. A start if desperate category would be good !!