To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
No, he is not. You have to be durable and consistent to be one of the best in baseball. Otherwise, you are James Paxton. Once upon a time there was a trendy argument that Paxton was an ace despite the innings. At this point we can see pretty clearly that he neverbelonged in the discussion. I figure that a guy like Woodruff has about as much in common with Josh Hader as he does Max Scherzer. I think is health and and reliability were something that other pitchers were going to willingly forfiet, they could probably K a few more guys and improve their ratios… but that is why he isn’t. The best pitchers in the game know how to pitch – they don’t just have good stuff. The good new is that Woodruff can be that guy someday, but as of now I don’t take him seriously as a starting pitcher. Doing it year-in-year-out is a lot different than doing it once or over part of a season. Its completely different. These kind of guys come and go. In this era we do fawn over those fluky little runs that we all know are not sustainable – you know Statcast and stuff. His health/approach is what will determine if he is a flash in the pan or not. History is full of guys that had a great year or two. It is hard to quantify what they did, but I suspect that it is generally rooted in luck or just a lack of sustainability. It is criminal that we are not talking about Max Scherzer as one of the best pitchers of all-time – that doesn’t make good clickbait though. Every word about some new generation of talent that will likely never materialize takes away from his legacy. Kershaw is also one of the all-time greats. This article is about whether we can pretend that Woodruff belongs in the same sentence as those two for one year. To which I would reply, who cares? Pitchers like Woodruff are in the middle of a starting pitcher and a reliever. No, I didn’t watch the video lol. I don’t watch breakdown videos… although if there is one to watch, then your would be a good choice. I think video breakdowns are just scummy. Some turkey is simply pointing out the success of a player and pretending that they have something to do with it… with the only real intention of promoting themselves. I suspect that this kind of “expertise” appeals to the Twitter fan, which I am not. A good video has a good transcript. A good transcript is an article. Most videos are just the lazy way to write an article, but they are good for the illiterate.